<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weasel Implementation in C#</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mariusbancila.ro/blog/2010/01/11/weasel-implementation-in-csharp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mariusbancila.ro/blog/2010/01/11/weasel-implementation-in-csharp/</link>
	<description>Sharing my opinions and ideas!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:37:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mariusbancila</title>
		<link>http://mariusbancila.ro/blog/2010/01/11/weasel-implementation-in-csharp/comment-page-1/#comment-32635</link>
		<dc:creator>mariusbancila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mariusbancila.ro/blog/?p=455#comment-32635</guid>
		<description>And on what do you base your statement that its very likely that humanoids with 4 hands lived at some point on Earth? I don&#039;t think so. Organism evolve from simple to complex. A 4 hands humanoid is more complex than a 2 hands humanoid. Even if there was a mutation that could cause 4 hands to appear, I don&#039;t see why it should have been passed the filter of natural selection. 2 hands are good enough for us to live a long life. What great advantage would 2 additional hands bring? I don&#039;t see that advantage, and that&#039;s why I think it is very unlikely that such a specie ever existed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And on what do you base your statement that its very likely that humanoids with 4 hands lived at some point on Earth? I don&#8217;t think so. Organism evolve from simple to complex. A 4 hands humanoid is more complex than a 2 hands humanoid. Even if there was a mutation that could cause 4 hands to appear, I don&#8217;t see why it should have been passed the filter of natural selection. 2 hands are good enough for us to live a long life. What great advantage would 2 additional hands bring? I don&#8217;t see that advantage, and that&#8217;s why I think it is very unlikely that such a specie ever existed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITist</title>
		<link>http://mariusbancila.ro/blog/2010/01/11/weasel-implementation-in-csharp/comment-page-1/#comment-32503</link>
		<dc:creator>ITist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mariusbancila.ro/blog/?p=455#comment-32503</guid>
		<description>I have only 1 question: I&#039;m wondering why humans with 4 hands, which were very likely it existed at some point, were not a better fit than us, and nature decided they should disapear? :) They couldn&#039;t multiply themselves as fast as 2 hands humanoids? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have only 1 question: I&#8217;m wondering why humans with 4 hands, which were very likely it existed at some point, were not a better fit than us, and nature decided they should disapear? <img src='http://mariusbancila.ro/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  They couldn&#8217;t multiply themselves as fast as 2 hands humanoids? <img src='http://mariusbancila.ro/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

